Go to table of contents Go to glossary

Getting Started ...

FAS-2 Class Review

By Kathy Jackson

The following class review was originally written in May, 2000. I was a brand-new handgun shooter, and although I was already fairly familiar with my handgun I probably should have started with a more basic class. I had fun though, and learned a lot. I'm posting it here mostly as a bit of self-indulgent nostalgia ... and because it's an excellent opportunity to say "thank you" to Gila and Marty Hayes, who have given so much to so many shooters over the years. I count myself to be incredibly blessed to have met these folks.

There have been a lot of changes at FAS since this article was written. FAS-2 doesn't truly even exist anymore; it has been replaced with a class named Defensive Handgun, and a great deal of the curricula has been reworked and rewritten. The class remains appropriate for intermediate- beginners (or beginning-intermediates), and continues to provide an excellent value for those interested in learning more about firearms safety, defensive handgunning, and the legal limits of lethal force.

You can find the website for the Firearms Academy of Seattle at www.firearmsacademy.com

~ Kathy

This past weekend, I took FAS-2 from the Firearms Academy of Seattle. The course was taught by Marty and Gila Hayes, both long-time firearms instructors, and was well worth the instruction fee.1

As a fairly new shooter -- I've been shooting handguns for a little less than a year now -- I found this course moved quickly and thoroughly through a lot of material that was foundational to good marksmanship and (more important) foundational to good self defense skills.

While originally I signed up for the course primarily to improve my shooting skills, I found I was most appreciative of the legal aspects of the training. After completing the course, I went home with my class notebook filled with notes in my own handwriting which detailed my understanding of the rules governing the use of deadly force.

Also included in my class notebook were notes taken while we watched police training videos. One of those videos, a re-enactment of an incident that took place in Baton Rouge back in the 70's, was truly hair-raising and provided a lot of material for class discussion as well as for serious thought.2

After covering the basics of range safety in the classroom, we moved to the range to work on shooting skills. I have to note here that the entire weekend was a very safe weekend and at no time did I believe that the instructors were unaware of safety considerations.

We started on the basics of marksmanship, starting with a good stance. Marty emphasized that each of us should be able to use any of the stances (Weaver, Chapman, Isosceles) with skill, since in any encounter we would not be able to dictate the circumstances and might not be able to choose our favored stance. That said, I discovered that my favorite stance is the Isosceles, the choice of most women. A friend who took the class with me told me that he much preferred the Weaver and shot best in that stance; personally I had a hard time hitting anything from that contorted and awkward position. Since he felt the same about the Isosceles, I guess if we do what we were taught, in order to become well-balanced shooters, I'll be practicing Weaver and he'll be practicing Isosceles for awhile now.3

Once the class had mastered single shot drills from each of the basic stances, concentrating on sight picture, smooth trigger pull, and follow through, we moved on to one hand shooting, multiple shot drills, and other positions -- speed squat, high kneeling, and low kneeling. I found I shot well from high and low kneeling but speed squat was difficult and awkward for me (free advice: if you want to learn to shoot speed squat well, put your gun away for awhile and practice deep knee bends!).

By the end of the class, we were working on low-light shooting, shooting multiple targets, and shooting while moving. I'm told all of these, plus tactical considerations, are covered more fully in FAS-3 and I fully intend to take that next course as soon as I've scraped enough money out of the grocery budget to do it.

It was a great weekend and definitely worth the money spent. We lucked out on getting weather that was as close to perfect as you'll ever see in this part of the world and that was definitely a plus. Good instruction, good shooting, good friends, and good weather -- does a weekend get any better than this?

And, to top all this off: Yesterday I took my first shooting buddy out to show him what I'd learned in the class. He's the man who got me started shooting handguns. He owns a homemade IPSC-style target stand and the last time we shot together I put a few holes through the wood slats on the outer edges, which he'd ribbed me about quite a bit. Yesterday we each shot off 100 rounds. I walked through the 60 round qualifier which finishes off FAS-2, and then shot 10 rounds or so while step-dragging/backing away from the target. The sneak loaded some snap caps in my mag for that one so I had to clear a "malfunction" while backing away. The rest of the ammo was shot off in various stances at distances ranging from 30 to 60 feet. At the end of the afternoon, all my shots had been on the 8 1/2 x 11 paper! Most of the groups looked pretty good, but even the ones that didn't, didn't have any real flyers. As we were packing up to go home, my buddy was examining his stand sourly and mock-complaining, "Hmph. The girl can shoot..."


Next Steps

TABLE OF CONTENTS




Footnotes

1. As with just about everything else at FAS, the fee structure has changed. As of January 2007, "Defensive Handgun" (the course most similar to the old FAS-2) costs $275 for 18 hours of training and instruction. [back]
2. "The Steve Chaney Incident" on the "Ultimate Survivors" video series. I've since seen that same video perhaps a dozen more times. It still gives me chills. [back]
3. I'm still mostly an Isosceles shooter, but have long since learned to be comfortable with and competent in both Weaver and Chapman as well.  [back]





Except where otherwise noted, all articles and images on this web site © 2006-2009 by Kathy Jackson. For permission to quote, please contact author.

Disclaimer: The author of this site assumes that you are an adult human being capable of making your own choices and taking responsibility for same. If you are not an adult, or are not capable of taking responsibility for your own choices, STOP. Do not read anything else on this site. The author has made a reasonable, good-faith effort to assure that the articles herein are accurate and contain good advice, but hereby advises the reader that the author is a normal human being who makes the normal number of human mistakes. Deal with it. If it sounds stupid to you, don't do it. The author accepts absolutely no responsibility whatsoever for anything you might say or do as a result of reading any material on this site. Live your own life.